Napoleon Perdis

Case study · Beauty ecommerce

Napoleon Perdis: three channels, each held to its own return

Napoleon Perdis has been an Australian cosmetics name for many years. We managed its Facebook, Google Ads and email, and reported every channel on its own numbers rather than one blended figure.

14.6:1Facebook return on ad spend
8:1Google Ads return
50:1Email return on investment
01

Why separate returns

A single blended return hides which channel is pulling its weight. Reporting each channel separately showed exactly where the money was working.

02

The search piece

The Google programme covered brand, category and product terms. It protected searches for the brand itself and picked up shoppers looking for cosmetics in general. It was managed for return rather than volume, and returned 8:1.

03

The other two channels

  • Facebook ran prospecting and retargeting across the range, with creative refreshed for each launch and focused on the shades in each range. It returned 14.6:1.
  • Email worked a large owned list with lifecycle flows and campaigns on the same launch calendar. At 50:1 it was the highest-returning channel.

This was a paid and email engagement rather than SEO. The lesson carries across: give each channel its own number, and it becomes obvious where to spend next.

Next case studyShowpo16:1 Return on SEO spend

Want to know where you stand?

A senior strategist will look at your rankings, links and AI visibility and tell you the three changes that would move the most.

Get a free review
Get a free reviewFree site score